Former Pfizer VP Warns Childbearing-age Women: ‘Do not Accept These Vaccines’

Excerpts:

In his brief presentation at Wednesday’s online “Stop the Shot” conference, former Pfizer vice president Dr. Michael Yeadon highlighted three reasons why women of childbearing years and younger should entirely reject experimental COVID-19 gene-therapy vaccines.

“You’re being lied to, I’m being lied to,” said the professional research scientist. “The authorities are not giving us full information about the risks of these products.”

Yeadon, who has degrees in biochemistry and toxicology and a Ph.D in respiratory pharmacology, worked for 32 years in the pharmaceutical industry and retired in 2011 from the most senior position in his field as vice president and chief scientist for allergy and respiratory at Pfizer.

From there, he founded his own biotech company, Ziarco, which was sold to the world’s largest drug company, Novartis, in 2017.

The British national explained his first point as being “so obvious” that all can agree. “We never, ever, give experimental medicines to pregnant women. Why do we not do that?” he asked.

He went on to explain how 60 years ago:

“women were exposed to a new product for morning sickness called thalidomide and it led to at least 10,000 birth malformations.”

Studies before its release at the time were not capable of identifying “thalidomide as a toxin in the womb.”

This tragedy, he explained, taught scientists that:

“babies are not safe and protected inside the uterus which is what we used to think. But, in fact, they’re a miracle of minute development. Critical stages, especially in the early stages, where if interfered with biochemicals or something else, can change the course of development of that child irreparably.”

“You never ever give inadequately tested medicines, medicinal products, to a pregnant woman,” he emphasized. “And that is exactly what is happening. Our government is urging pregnant women, and women of childbearing age, to get vaccinated. And they’re telling them they’re safe. And that’s a lie because those studies have simply not been done.”

Furthermore, “reproductive toxicology has not been undertaken with any of these products, certainly not a full battery of tests that you would want” Yeadon said.

But with a closer look, Yeadon said that given two other studies, the situation looks “much worse” due to evidence of actual damaging effects on fertility.

Continue reading the article at LifeSiteNews.com.