As concerns grow about the rushed development of a vaccine to treat COVID19 a back and forth debate has ensued as to whether such a vaccine could dangerously alter human DNA. Herein we examine the basics.
There is no secret about it: the proposed COVID19 RNA vaccine (or mRNA vaccine) is a new type of vaccine supposed to offer acquired immunity through lipid nanoparticles.
As Wikipedia will have you believe it is:
“Just like normal vaccines, RNA vaccines are intended to induce the production of antibodies which will bind to potential pathogens.”
Reuters’ ‘Fact Checkers’ have been at the forefront of pushing back on ‘conspiracy theory’ claims that such a vaccine could be used with malicious intent against humanity.
The mainstream media wants to dispel any notion that Big Pharma, led by billionaire, Bill Gates, is planning to modify the DNA in every vaccinated person as part of a human re-engineering program for a new (compliant) sub species of human more easily controlled by a globalist cabal.
Of course, this sounds like the fanciful stuff of a nightmare science fiction plot. But before you dismiss it out of hand let me ask you to consider two words: RNA Interference.
RNA Interference (RNAi)
Wikipedia tells us:
“RNA interference (RNAi) is a biological process in which RNA molecules inhibit gene expression or translation, by neutralizing targeted mRNA molecules. Historically, RNAi was known by other names, including co-suppression, post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS), and quelling.”
It turns out that in 2006 the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was awarded to Andrew Fire and Craig C. Mello for revolutionary work on RNA interference.
Since the discovery of RNAi and its regulatory potentials, it has become evident that RNAi has immense potential in suppression of desired genes. Our bodies are filled with small ribonucleic acid (RNA) molecules which are the building blocks for the complex biological systems within our bodies.
For example, scientists in the medical field can now interfere with these microscopic building blocks to switch on or off gene expression, to help regulate illnesses or say, susceptibility to cancers. In a vaccine the technology can be effective to help prevent certain infections. It is not unreasonable to postulate much good can be derived using RNAi to help eradicate certain hereditary diseases.
Now there are two sides to this fascinating technology. Aside from the good, there is potential for bad.
In an environment where vaccine regulation, testing and quality control are compromised or lax it is perfectly conceivable that malign forces could apply a Trojan Horse strategy to use vaccines to implant RNAi into our bodies to make us sicker or to modify behaviors and biological processes to suit a predetermined agenda.
Is this happening right now with the COVID19 vaccine?
A good question, but not an easy one to answer.
But what we do know for sure is that the potential for a malign abuse of vaccines does exist because current enforcement of vaccine safety and quality control appears non-existent.
What evidence do we have for that?
Look no further than the campaign work in the courts of Robert Kennedy Jr (son of Robert Kennedy and nephew of assassinated US President JFK). In her article: ‘The Injection Fraud – It’s Not A Vaccine’ Catherine Austin Fitts tells us:
“Thanks to the work of Robert Kennedy and Mary Holland of Children’s Health Defense, I now understand the enormous profits generated by so-called “vaccines” subsequent to the passage of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 and the creation of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program—a federal no-fault mechanism for compensating vaccine-related injuries or deaths by establishing a claim procedure involving the United States Court of Federal Claims and special masters. Call a drug or biotech cocktail a “vaccine,” and pharmaceutical and biotech companies are free from any liabilities—the taxpayer pays. Unfortunately, this system has become an open invitation to make billions from “injectibles,” particularly where government regulations and laws can be used to create a guaranteed market through mandates. As government agencies and legislators as well as the corporate media have developed various schemes to participate in the billions of profits, significant conflicts of interest have resulted.”
The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREPA or the PREP Act) became law in 2005, adding to corporate freedoms from liability. Similar laws exist in most other countries around the world. In other words, vaccine companies have a ‘get out of jail free card’ for any adverse effects their products cause. No other type of business enjoys such a lavish exemption under law.
In March 2020 Robert F Kennedy’s succeeded in court in forcing the CDC to admit that it had failed to undertake any vaccine safety tests. In short, nobody knows whether vaccines are safe or not. The relevant documents detailing these findings can be accessed here and here. [1, 2]
A previous court win was the case which forced HHS to admit there had not been any safety studies submitted to Congress (as mandated in the NCVIA 1983) for the past 30 years.Recently, Robert F. Kennedy Jr issued this statement:“A disturbing warning letter from German naturopath Anette Lillinger to all of her patients inquiring about the upcoming coronavirus vaccine —“For all my patients:I would like to urgently draw your attention to important questions concerning a forthcoming Covid-19 vaccination:Due to the new mode of action of the future coronavirus vaccine, such cure successes will no longer be possible in the future. For the first time in the history of vaccination, the so-called latest generation mRNA vaccines intervene directly in the patient’s genetic material and thus change the individual genetic material, which represents genetic manipulation – something that has been banned , even considered criminal so far.This intervention can be compared to that of genetically manipulated foods, which is also very controversial. Even if the media and politicians currently trivialize the issue and even call without thinking about a new type of vaccination in order to return to normalcy, such vaccination is problematic in terms of health, morals and ethics and also in terms of genetic damage which, unlike damage caused by previous vaccinations, will now be irreversible and irreparable.Dear patients, after such an unprecedented vaccination against mRNA, you will no longer be able to cure the symptoms of vaccination in a complementary manner.You will have to live with the consequences, because they can no longer be cured simply by eliminating toxins from the human body, just as you cannot cure a person with a genetic defect such as Down’s syndrome or 21, Klinefelter syndrome, Turner’s syndrome, genetics heart disease, haemophilia, cystic fibrosis, Rett syndrome, etc.), because the genetic defect is once and for all present!Clearly, this means: if you develop a symptom of vaccination after vaccination with mRNA, neither I nor any other therapist can help you in a causal way, because the damage caused by the vaccination will be genetically irreversible. In my opinion, these new vaccines represent a crime against humanity that has never been committed in such a broad form in history.As Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, an experienced doctor, said yesterday: In reality, this “promising vaccine” for the vast majority of people is in fact prohibited genetic manipulation!”“The vaccine, developed and championed by Anthony Fauci and financed by Bill Gates, used an experimental mRNA technology. Three of the 15 human guinea pigs (20%) suffered a “serious adverse event”. Moderna acknowledged that three volunteers developed Grade 3 systemic events defined by the FDA as “Preventing daily activity, and requiring medical intervention.”
— Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.”
If, as a matter of routine, no safety studies are ever submitted and assessed, then the vaccine companies could literally get away with murder.
Why would vaccine manufacturers want to ‘murder’ us?
Bill Gates, through philanthropist projects, has been positioned as a likeable, mild-mannered figure, who expresses his ambition to improve the health of the world through new vaccine development and technological innovation.
But documents tie Gates, his family and their organisations to ulterior motives contrary to saving lives. Firstly, Bill Gates Snr served on the board of Planned Parenthood (PP) during the group’s infancy — a re-branded organisation birthed out of the American Eugenics Society.
Planned Parenthood was built on population control schemes. Bill Gates proudly speaks on his father’s involvement on the board of Planned Parenthood, which was founded on the concept that most human beings are just “reckless breeders”. This morphed into the Gates Learning Foundation to create the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in 2000.
In 2017, the Gates Foundation pledged $375 million for ‘family planning’, with the goal of providing contraception to 120 million women across the world, particularly in developing countries. In India and Africa vaccination programs linked to the Foundation are alleged to have caused hundreds of thousands of deaths and permanent injury. Gates is now persona non grata in India.
Mr and Mrs Gates are now firmly partnered up with UN organizations like the World Health Organisation (WHO) and UNICEF.
Gates and his associates increasingly dominate and control the world’s systems, including in the areas of technology, medicine and now agriculture ( evidence that GMOs cause disease has been piling up for decades).
It is this scenario that fuels the fire of any conspiracy theory such that is perfectly plausible that RNA Interference (RNAi) may be a tool used by a global corporate elite to engineer biological changes to anyone who is vaccinated.
Be in no doubt that:
(a) RNA interference (RNAi) is a cellular mechanism for controlling gene expression, in which the cell uses small RNAs to achieve posttranscriptional specific gene silencing and:
(b) Bill Gates has a proven track record to suggest he may use vaccination to adversely impact population density and health.
Our complacency as a society in providing such a foolish legal immunity to vaccine companies is why this argument will rage on. All despite mainstream news outlets such as Reuters working hard to make you believe Bill Gates and co. are nothing but kind-hearted philanthropists (despite also being eugenicists).
How you reconcile philanthropy with eugenics should baffle any serious thinker.